Dating After the End of the World

My rating: 1 of 5 stars
0.5 / 5.0
I have just finished chapter one and am disgusted by this. There is…
1. Normalization of abusive behavior as “a crush”, by the FMC father.
2. Defense of said abusive behavior in the disguise Take the High Road (just because he’s awful doesn’t mean you should be) without actually acknowledging that this boy is exhibiting concerning behavior that should be dealt with.
3. The sexualization of children who are 13. The author not only writes this normalization crap about boys abusing girls because they are “crushing” on them, the author then doubles down and adds that the girls in the FMC’s class believe the boy is “hot”. Prepubescent children are what now?
How is this narrative still ok? How did this get past a team of editors and the publisher’s legal because, wtf?!? WTF?!?
And anyone commenting I am an over sensitive, liberal woke prude, please do! Makes it easier for the proper authorities can track you down and investigate the skeletons in your closet. Gross. 🤢
MC
HAHAHAHA, turns out Amazon was the first to object to my review. It needed a more friendly reason for the low rating and I had to be nicer to the community. Translation: we can and will censor voices that aren’t a part of the narrative we’re supporting (ie: fundi-christian, patriarchal, gelding boys)
View all my reviews
Comments
Post a Comment